ATTORNEY GENERAL OF ADAMAWA STATE & ORS. V. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE FEDERATION & ORS.
(2005) JELR 39643 (SC)
Supreme Court
•
SC.144/2004
•
16 Dec 2005
•
Nigeria
Coram
MUHAMMADU LAWAL UWAIS CJN
IDRIS LEGBO KUTIGI JSC
AKINTOLA OLUFEMI EJIWUNMI JSC
DAHIRU MUSDAPHER JSC
IGNATIUS CHUKWUDI PATS-ACHOLONU JSC
GEORGE ADESOLA OGUNTADE JSC
ALOMA MARIAM MUKHTAR JSC
Appearances
Yusuf Ali, SAN (with him, A. O. Adelodun, R. A. Lawal Rabana, I. S. Fagbemi (DCL, Kwara State); P. O. Ibrahim (Legal Officer): S. A. Oke, J. I. Jacob and A. O. Ojongbede) For the Appellant.
A. O. Mbamali [Mrs.], Ag. D.C.L., Federal Ministry of Justice (with her, C. O. Assam (Asst. Chief Legal Officer) and R. Clark (Senior Legal Officer), B. Dan-Abia (Attorney-General of Akwa Ibom State) (with him,A. Ekong-Bassey, SAN, 1.E. Ukana, B. J. Ekanem, Tony Uwah, C. A. Udoh and M. Ukpong) - T. Ongolo, SAN (Attorney-General of Bayelsa State) (with him,M. T. Kachina); N. Andem-Ewa [Mrs.] (with her, L. Garrick)Professor A. A. Utuama, SAN (Attorney-General of Delta State) (with him. G. E. Okirhienyefa (Solicitor-General), O. Pedro and E. Owhovoriole)Prof. Y.Osibajo, SAN (Attorney-General of Lagos State) (with him, O. Durojaiye, L. Pedro (Head, D.C.L.); Chuks Nwanlikwu, A. Haroun, O. Adewale, A. O. Salami and E. R. Iyamu) A. Fashanu, SAN (with him, T. A. Okunsokan) 8th Defendant absent and not representedH. O. Ajumogobia, SAN (Attorney-General of Rivers State) {with him. M. U. Wakama [Mrs.] D.C.L., A. C. Amadi (Senior State Counsel) and D. D. Ihua-Maduenyi (State Counsel) For the Respondent.
Judgement
<p style="text-align: justify"><strong>UWAIS, C.J.N. (Delivering the Leading Judgment):</strong> This suit was commenced by an originating summons, supported by an affidavit filed on behalf of all the plaintiffs by their counsel. The following reliefs, which have been stated in the originating summons are being sought by the plaintiffs: -</p><p style="text-align: justify">1. Declaration that the Allocation of Revenue (Abolition of Dichotomy in the Application of the Principle of Derivation) Act, 2004 is unconstitutional,ultra vires the defendants and therefore null and void.</p><p style="text-align: justify">2. Declaration that the 1st and 10th defendants are without constitutional powers to rely on the Allocation of Revenue (Abolition of Dichotomy in the Application of the Principle of Derivation) Act, 2004 for the purposes of allocation of revenue to the states and local governments from the Federation Account.</p><p style="text-align: justify">3. Order directing the defendants to forthwith stop the implementation and reliance on the said Allocation of Revenue (Abolition of Dichotomy in the Application of the Principle of Derivation…</p>