<p style="text-align: center"><strong><u>RULING</u></strong></p><p style="text-align: justify">The applicant, <strong>Hon. Lady Justice Murugi Geteria Mugo </strong>has by Motion brought under <strong>rules 44, 46(1), 89(1) </strong>and <strong>90 </strong>of the <strong>Court of Appeal Rules, 2022 </strong>applied for leave to file a Supplementary Record of Appeal out of time “for the proper determination of the appeal”; that the annexed Supplementary Record be deemed as filed and served and that I grant leave to amend the heading of Record and Memorandum of Appeal to reflect the correct name of the 1st respondent, The Magistrates and Judges Vetting Board (sic). In grounds in support of the Motion and in her supporting affidavit the applicant says that she has recently discovered that certain critical documents of the impugned Judgment were inadvertently left out of the Record of Appeal rendering the same incomplete; that Supplementary Record of Appeal is intended to correct that inadvertence; that it is in the interest of justice that the applicant files the missing documents through a Supplementary Record of Appeal; that the matter rel…</p>