RULING OF THE COURT
Before us is a Notice of Motion filed by the applicants under certificate of urgency on 8th May, 2020. It is seeking an injunction and restraining orders against the respondents, from leasing, selling, transferring, or in any way alienating subject property known as LR No. 209/14582 (Original LR No 209/106110) to China Bridge Corporation Ltd, or any other party during the pendency of the appeal which is scheduled for the 10th July, 2010. The application is supported by the affidavit of Ceciliah Wanjiru Gichuru and Fridah Khavere Ambani. Both deponents make several allegations but key among them is that the respondents are in the process of, or have already leased, or transferred the said land to China Bridge Corporation Ltd so as to defeat the cause of justice as the matter is pending determination by this Court on 10th July, 2010 in Civil Appeal No 179 of 2019.
The application is opposed by the 1st to the 3rd respondents vide a replying affidavit sworn by Chief Inspector Geofrey Waruru Kinyua who has also made serious allegations against the applicants accusing them of forgeries and impugns the process the applicants purported to have used to acquire the said title which he states does not even exists. Key of those allegations is that, apart from the pending judgement in this Court, there is also another suit pending before the Environment and Land Court being ELC No 2028 of 2009 between Benta Kalara Achieng and Wilson Mutumba Women Group v. Attorney General. Which is over the same parcel of land or based on the same facts.
As can be seen from the order sought, it is against China Bridge Corporation Ltd, who were served with the application but were not parties to the Civil Appeal that is pending. Nonetheless, they too have strenuously opposed this application on the grounds that they were not parties to the suit, and the applicants ought to have joined them in the matter. Secondly, the order by Nyamu, J. (as he then was) that gave rise to the appeal, was as a result of judicial review proceedings where there was no order of injunction sought and therefore it cannot be granted a matter that has been finalized and waiting judgement.
Upon considering this application, we recognize that this Court is seized of the appeal which is pending determination of the various issues some of which may have been repeated in the instant application. All the allegations made by the applicants are denied by the respondents who in turn make serious allegations against the applicants. To complicate matters further, the order is to be directed to China Bridge Corporation Ltd who were not parties to the pending appeal. One matter that is not disputed is that the 1st respondent is in possession of the suit land, but it is not clear to us whether the land has been sold or leased out or alienated in any manner.
In our considered view that, in the face of the conflicting positions taken by each side, the order that commends itself at the moment is one to maintain the status quo obtaining as at the date of delivery of this ruling to be maintained by the respondents until the delivery of the pending judgment.
Dated and delivered at Nairobi this day 10th day of July, 2020
M. K. KOOME
..........................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
D. K. MUSINGA
...........................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
F. SICHALE
.............................
JUDGE OF APPEAL
I certify that this is a true copy of the original
Signed
DEPUTY REGISTRAR