REASONS FOR JUDGMENT
1. On 23rd June, 2017 this Court partially allowed this appeal, set aside the High Court judgment dated 2nd June, 2017 and ordered the 1st respondent to conduct fresh nomination exercise for the position of member of County Assembly, Korogocho Ward, (the Ward) Ruaraka constituency within Nairobi County, in accordance with the 1st respondent’s Election and Nomination Rules. Each party was ordered to bear its own costs.
2. In view of the urgency of the appeal, the Court was not able to give reasons for its decision on 23rd June as above stated; it indicated that the reasons would be given on 28th July, 2017. That we hereby do.
BACKGROUND
3. The appellant and the 2nd respondent were contestants in the 1st respondent’s party primaries held on 30th April, 2017 for the position of member of County Assembly for the aforesaid ward. The appellant allegedly garnered 635 votes but the Returning Officer declared that he got 600 votes. The 2nd respondent was declared the winner, h…