RULING OF THE COURT
The applicant, MICHAEL MUNGAI, appears in person as he has always done in the previous matters before this Court. That being the case, the Court has granted him some latitude so that he could ventilate his grievances. But as it happens with an aggrieved litigant, he is ready and willing to vilify anybody who does not support his point of view. It therefore becomes very difficult to deal with such a litigant who insists on personally prosecuting his case. What does the applicant want? We can do no better than go to what was filed in Court. The application is entitled:- “In the matter of reviews and correction of errors, omissions and mistakes in Court records, directives, notices, warnings, bills, etc so as to facilitate execution of competent High Court offers, decrees, rulings, directives, bills, notices, warnings etc. In the matter of intrusion and blocked execution of Court orders in HCCA 335 of 1997 and HCCC 17 of 2001.Being an appeal to clear contempt of Court …