<p style="text-align: center"><strong><u> JUDGMENT</u></strong></p><p style="text-align: justify"><strong><u>BRIGHT MENSAH JA</u></strong></p><p style="text-align: justify">The Supreme Court speaking through Adinyira JSC stated in the case,<strong><em> R v. High Court (Land Division Court 2) Accra; Exparte Alhassan Ltd (Thaddeus Sory – Interested Party) (2011) SCGLR 478</em></strong> that it is a basic principle of common law that Certiorari and Prohibition would be automatically granted to quash a judgment or prevent a biased judge from hearing a suit upon satisfactory proof of breach of any principles of the rules of natural justice. </p><p style="text-align: justify">The caveat is, has the applicant/appellant in the instant appeal made a sufficient case to entitle him to such orders he sought by his application?  And is it the general position of the law that it is automatic as posited by <strong>Adinyira JSC</strong> that a party is always invariably entitled to such remedies when he has established his case?  This is the premise on which I shall proceed to consider the present appeal.</p><p style="text-align: justify">As a matter of convenience, in this instant appeal, I shall simply refer to the applicant/appellant as the appellant an…</p>