JUDGMENT OF THE COURT
This appeal is an example of the confusion which can ensue when proceedings start in a convoluted manner.
Yiapas Ole Seese, (1st appellant), Jackson Kijanko (2nd appellant), Solonka Ole Nayiaha (3rd appellant), Samuel Ole Parashuru (4th appellant) and Meoli Ole Kirasi (5th appellant) commenced proceedings by plaint in the High Court at Nairobi, naming Sakita Ole Narok (1st respondent), Lemomo Ole Ntenkese (2nd respondent) and Tupet Ole Murre (3rd respondent) as the defendants, and indicated that they were suing these three on their own behalf and on behalf of all members of Batimaru Group Ranch. In effect theirs was a representative suit within the meaning of Order 1 rule 8 (1) of the Civil Procedure Rules. The appellants realized this and on 13th February, 2001, they brought an application by chamber summons under the aforesaid rule and section 3A of the Civil Procedure Act. Problems in their suit started when they included prayers in that application which, prima…