<h2 class="ql-align-center">JUDGMENT</h2><p><strong>ACKAH-YENSU, JA</strong></p><p>The facts leading to this appeal do not appear to be in controversy and can be deduced from the affidavits and annexures filed. On December 29, 2014, the Applicant/Respondent (hereinafter referred to as the “Respondent”), made an application to the High Court, Labour and Industrial Division, for an order to enforce the decision of the Respondent pursuant to section 172 of the Labour Act, 2003 (Act 561). A Complaint had been made to Respondent against the Respondent/Appellant (herein also to be referred to as the “Appellant”) on October 25, 2013 by one Daniel Oblie Quaye, a former employee of the Appellant. The reliefs sought in the said Complaint were as follows:</p><p> “(a) A fully paid termination benefits.</p><p> (b) All outstanding loans be waived off.</p><p> (c) Social Security payments for remaining active years.</p><p>(d) Any other benefits deemed appropriate by the Commission”.</p><p>Following the lodgment of the Complaint, and by a letter dated November 1, 2013 the Respondent forwar…</p>