<p class="ql-align-justify"><strong><span style="background-color: transparent"> J U D G M E N T</span></strong></p><p class="ql-align-justify"><strong><span style="background-color: transparent">Adjei-Frimpong, J.A:</span></strong></p><p class="ql-align-justify"><span style="background-color: transparent">This suit raises an issue of some procedural law importance. In the main, it turns on a claimant having capacity to sue but losing such capacity after the action has been commenced. What should be the effect of such loss of capacity on the claim being pursued? </span></p><p class="ql-align-justify"><span style="background-color: transparent">It is axiomatic that capacity to sue or locus standi is always a crucial matter in any civil suit when challenged. For a suit to be competent for adjudication by a court, there must be at least a competent Plaintiff and a competent Defendant in the sense that both were juristic persons with locus standi to sue and be sued. Where the existing Plaintiff or Defendant lacks competence, it renders the action incompetent regardless of the merits and the court is robbed of its requisite jurisdiction to determine the underlying claim.</span></p><p class="ql-align-justify"><span style="background-color: transparent">That the Plaintiff/Respondent (herein ‘Plaintiff’) was clothed with capacity at the commencement of the instant action at the trial court became common ground. The Defend…</span></p>