JUDGMENTĀ
Parties herein are workers of the banking sector. Plaintiffs are a coupleĀ with the 2nd plaintiff being a wife of the 1st plaintiff who also works with the defendant at First capital plus bank. It is the case of the plaintiffs thatĀ they contracted with the defendant for the purchase of a vehicle, butĀ when the vehicle was delivered, contrary to the normal function of everyĀ vehicle, it was stationary and failed to perform its function of moving fromĀ one place to the other, they therefore sued on 24th June 2014, claiming theĀ following reliefs:Ā
i. A declaration that the defendant had been fraudulent in hisĀ dealings with the plaintiffĀ
ii. A declaration that the defendant has breached the agreement heĀ entered into with the plaintiff to import for them a used 4x4 carĀ which can be driven and accident freeĀ
iii. General damages against the defendant for breach of contract iv. An order directed at the defendant to refund to the plaintiff theĀ cedi equivalent of $16,470Ā
v. Interā¦