<p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>JUDGMENT </p><p> </p><p>1. BACKGROUND </p><p>The originating motion for the enforcement of Fundamental Human Rights has been filed on 24-04-2018, pursuant to Articles 23 and 33 (i) of the constitution and order 67 of C.I. 47/04. </p><p>The facts in support can be found in the depositions of the Applicant, Frank Percy Sankah. </p><p>Respondent filed an affidavit in answer and a supplementary affidavit as well. Both sides have filed written legal submissions. </p><p>This action was not set down for hearing as required by rules of Court, namely Order 67 Rule 5 of C.I. 47/04. </p><p>But from the reliefs indorsed, the matter in contention are descernible. </p><p>The reliefs are these: </p><p>i. An order of certiorari to bring up and quash the suspension letter dated the 16th March, 2018 and the 12th April, 2018. </p><p>ii. An order of Mandamus compelling the Respondent to restore and pay the salary, benefits, arrears, allowances and all other entitlements due the Applicant. </p><p>iii. A declaration that Applicant’s rights have been infringed upon by the 1st…</p>