judy.legal
Login Register
๐Ÿ“„ PDF

HEBERT MUGANDA V. WILFRED OLUOCH ODALO, JOHN OBONYO, ORANGE DEMOCRATIC MOVEMENT & INDEPENDENT ELECTORAL AND BOUNDARIES COMMISSION

(2017) JELR 101625 (CA)

Court of Appeal  •  Civil Appeal 146 of 2017  •  29 Sep 2017  •  Kenya

Coram
Roselyn Naliaka Nambuye, Daniel Kiio Musinga, Stephen Gatembu Kairu

Judgement

JUDGMENT OF THE COURT

(Rule 32 (5) of the Court of Appeal Rules)

The appeal was exhaustively argued before us on the 7th day of June, 2017 by learned counsel Mr. Ochieng Opiyo, instructed by the firm of Ochieng Opiyo and Company Advocates for the appellant, Herbert Muganda (Herbert), Ochich T.L.O instructed by the firm of Ochich T.L.O and Company Advocates for the 1st respondent, Wilfred Oluoch Odalo, (Wilfred); and George Wandati, instructed by the firm of Wandati and Company Advocates, for the 3rd Respondent, the Orange Democratic Movement (ODM). There was no representation for the 2nd respondent, John Obonyo (John), and the 4th respondent, the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC), but with notice. In a judgment dated the 12th day of June 2017, we allowed the appeal against the impugned judgment of F. Tuiyot, J. dated the 23rd day of May, 2017 on terms as follows:

โ€œ(1) The judgment, orders and decree of Hon. F. Tuiyot, J dated the 23rd day of May, 2017 be and is herebโ€ฆ

There's more. Sign in to continue reading

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 20,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.


Get started   Login