<p class="ql-align-center">IN THE COURT OF APPEAL</p><p class="ql-align-center">AT NAIROBI</p><p class="ql-align-center">(Coram: Nyarangi JA, Gicheru and Kwach AG JJ A)</p><p class="ql-align-center">CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 26 OF 1989</p><p class="ql-align-center">JETHWA...................................................APPLICANT</p><p class="ql-align-center">VERSUS</p><p class="ql-align-center">SHAH T/A SUPREME STYLES........RESPONDENT</p><p class="ql-align-center">JUDGMENT</p><p class="ql-align-center"><em>(Application for stay of execution in an intended appeal from a judgment and decree of the High Court at Nairobi, Pall Ag J, </em></p><p class="ql-align-center"><em>in </em></p><p class="ql-align-center"><em>HCCC No 1943 of 1988 dated 6th February 1989)</em></p><p class="ql-align-center">*************************************</p><p class="ql-align-justify">July 10, 1989 the following Judgment of the Court was delivered.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">The Court has before it an application under rule 1 (3) and rule 5 (2) (b) of the Rules of this Court for an order for execution of the decree and taxed costs be stayed upon terms giving security on stated modes.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">Generally, an applicant in these circumstances would be entitled to an order of stay of execution to preserve the subject-matter so that the appeal if successful is not rendered nugatory.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">The applicant has a money decree against him. So, besides demonstrating that any success in…</p>