judy.legal
Login Register
📄 PDF

BELLO KASAMU (FOR BELLO KASUMU FABOLUDE FAMILY) ALHAJI LATEEF BURAIMO (FOR SERIKI MUSA FAMILY) PEPESILE OGUNJUWON (FOR OGUNJUWON FAMILY) BELLO ESORUN (FOR BANJOKO ESORUN FAMILY) ADENIJI ADEKUNLE (FOR ARIFANLA FAMILY) ALHAJA ADIJATU ELEGBA (FOR IMORU FAMILY) V. SAIDI OGUNDIMU SAULA OGUNDIMU KEHINDE AGANRAN TAORIDI OGUNDIMU (FOR AND ON BEHALF OF OGUNDIMU FAMILY) PRINCE ASHIMIU ISIAKA CHIEF WAIDI ABU CHIEF LATIFU APENA CHIEF OLASENI SEIDU CHIEF DISU ALIMI ALHAJI GANIYU OBATULA (FOR THEMSELVES AND ALL OTHER MEMBERS OF THE OLOFIN OF ISHERI CHIEFTAINCY FAMILY) PRINCE SUBERU AINA OKO CHIEF ALIMI BAMISEBI CHIEF HAMZAT ADEYEMI OJO SERIKI MR. AHMED GHAZAL AJAYI MR. LATIFU KOLAWOLE AJAYI MR. AKINTUNDE AKINYEMI PRINCE TAIWO AKINGBADE (FOR THEMSELVES AND ON BEHALF OF MEMBERS OF THE OJO SERIKI/KUDORO APERIN FAMILY OF OTA)

(2016) JELR 51717 (CA)

Court of Appeal  •  CA/I/76/1993  •  30 Jun 2016  •  Nigeria

Coram
HARUNA SIMON TSAMMANI JCA (Presided) OBIETONBARA DANIEL-KALIO JCA (Read the Lead NONYEREM OKORONKWO JCA

Appearances
O. O. Ojutalayo (with him, E. O. Shittu (Mrs.) and A. A. -*- -*- Isiolaotan) - for the Appellants. A -*- Olumide Oridupa - for the 1st - 4th Respondents. Olatokunbo Philips (with him, Damilola Onigbinde) - for the 5th - 10th Respondents. -*- S. I. Adepoju (Mrs) - for the 11th - 17th Respondents. B

Judgement

DANIEL-KALIO JCA (Delivering the Lead Judgment): This appeal is against the judgment of the Ogun State High Court in a land matter. The writ of summons was filed on 21May 1981. Reckoning from that time to now, it means that the matter has been in court for 35 years. That is a long time. It calls to mind the legal maxim justitiae dilatio est quaedam negatio meaning delay of justice is a kind of negation of justice or as popularly expressed, justice delayed is justice denied. The length of time in court calls for sober reflection by all concerned, that is, the litigants being dominus litis as far as decisions on the lawsuit go, learned counsel being dominus litis as far as their professional handling of the matter is concerned, and the judge himself being dominus litis over the proceedings in court. Had all three played their part assiduously, the proceedings would not have progressed at such a ponderous pace as has apparently been the case. The 1st - 4th respondents who were …

There's more. Sign in to continue reading

judy.legal is the comprehensive database of case law and legislation from Ghana, Kenya and Nigeria. Gain seamless access to over 20,000 cases, recent judgments, statutes, and rules of court.


Get started   Login