Cookie Policy
BUTLER LLOYD, ACTING C.J., NIGERIA, BAKER AND JEFFREYS, JJ. In this case the learned trial Judge gave judgment for the plaintiff for £116 0s 0d representing the difference between his salary between February, 1938, and October, 1940, and the amount actually paid. In doing so he relied on a copy of an unsigned, undated and unstamped document by which the plaintiff agreed to enter the service of one Auerbacher at Kano at 80 rupees a month plus 20s a week food allowance. In our opinion this document should not have been admitted in evidence and even if admissible it was of no evidential value in support of the plaintiff’s claim.
There was however evidence that in July, 1937, plaintiff was authorised by the defendants to draw salary at the rate of £12 a month from cash at his station Gaidam but in February, 1938, the defendants informed him that this would be reduced to £10 as his purchases had not increased and it is clear both from exhibits put in by the plaintiff himself and from his particulars of claim that the plaintiff accepted this reduction. There was also evidence that plaintiff was on leave during September and October, 1939, and that on his return to work his salary was further reduced to £8 and from July, 1940, again reduced to £6 a month.
We think that the learned trial Judge misdirected himself in saying “there is nothing to show that there was any termination of employment or any question of re-engagement at a lower salary .”
We think that he further misdirected himself in referring to the various reductions of salary as arbitrary deductions in respect of shortages incurred through plaintiff’s negligence.
The appeal must be allowed and judgment entered for the defendants-appellants.
We assess costs at thirty guineas.
The amount in Court to be paid out to the appellants.