<p class="ql-align-center">IN THE COURT OF APPEAL</p><p class="ql-align-center">AT NAIROBI</p><p class="ql-align-center">(Coram: Nyarangi, Gicheru and Kwach JJ A)</p><p class="ql-align-center">CIVIL APPLICATION NO NAI 182 OF 1989</p><p class="ql-align-center">MONTAGUE CHARLES RUBEN and 9 OTHERS...........APPELLANT</p><p class="ql-align-center">VERSUS</p><p class="ql-align-center">PETER CHARLES NDERITU .....................................RESPONDENT</p><p class="ql-align-center">ELIZABETH WARIARA NDERITU.............................RESPONDENT</p><p class="ql-align-center">RULING</p><p class="ql-align-center"><em>(In an intended appeal from the Ruling of the High Court at Nairobi, Shields J, dated 11th October 1989, </em></p><p class="ql-align-center"><em>in </em></p><p class="ql-align-center"><em>High Court Civil Case No 1097 of 1989)</em></p><p class="ql-align-center">***************************************</p><p class="ql-align-justify">November 9, 1989, the following Ruling of the Court was delivered.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">This is an application under rule 5(2)(b) of the Court of Appeal Rules brought by ten applicants – Montague Charles Ruben, Adriane Pietro Landra, Dodwell and Company (East Africa) Limited, Manaseeh Sidnick, Catherine Margaret Fisher, America Life Insurance Company, Bengt Beckman, The Government of the Kingdom of Sweden and Rosslyn Development Limited – (hereinafter called “the plaintiffs”). The plaintiffs are seeking a stay of the orde…</p>