<p class="ql-align-center">JUDGMENT OF THE COURT</p><p class="ql-align-justify">In this second appeal, the appellants Stanley N. Muriithi and Joseph M. Stanley have challenged the judgment of the High Court at Embu (Ong&#x27;udi, J) dated 29^th May, 2013 in Embu H.C.C.A. No. 116 of 2007. The appellants vide the memorandum of appeal dated 25^th March, 2014 seek that the appeal be allowed and the judgment be set aside with costs. The appeal is premised on four grounds as follows;</p><p><em>That the learned Judge erred in law in failing to fairly and/or properly analyze the evidence adduced in the subordinate Courts. </em></p><p><em>That the learned Judge erred in law in disregarding the submissions made on behalf of the appellants.</em></p><p><em>That the learned Judge erred in law in disregarding the exhibits produced by the appellants. </em></p><p><em>That the learned Judge erred in law in disregarding the fact that the appellant&#x27;s claim was in regard to Plot No. 19, Kibingo village whereas the Respondent&#x27;s plot was Plot No. 19B Kibingo Village.”</em></p><p class="ql-align-justify">The appeal before the High Court arose from the Senior Residen…</p>