<p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>BY COURT: R U L I N G </p><p> </p><p>This motion for stay of proceedings/suspension of consequential orders filed on 13/07/2018 has a deposition made by Benjamin Annang Adjei in support. </p><p>The averments are to the effect that on 26/01/2018, a writ had been filed by Applicants and a motion for interlocutory injunction was filed the same day too, by the Applicants. </p><p>Furthermore, the reason for the application under consideration could be found in paragraph 6, where it has been stated, this Court (differently constituted) gave consequential orders, in a motion for interlocutory injunction (as it EXHIBIT ‘BAF 2’), which permitted 1st Respondent to develop some projects. And Applicants were also permitted to develop the portion of land granted to them. </p><p>It has been contended that the Court erred in granting that order, as it has resulted in series of confrontations on the land, as these developments the Court permitted both sides to execute, fall on the same plots being claimed by parties to the …</p>