<p class="ql-align-center">JUDGMENT OF THE COURT</p><p class="ql-align-justify">This is an interlocutory appeal arising from the Ruling of R.E. Ougo, J. dated the 6^th day of March, 2014 dismissing the appellant’s application for injunction.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">The brief background to the appeal is that, the appellant joined the 1^st and 2^nd respondents in 2004 as a full member after paying the requisite fee of Kshs.90,825.The relationship between the appellant and the 1^st and 2^nd respondents is contractual. The terms of engagement are outlined partly in the 1^st and 2^nd</p><p class="ql-align-justify">respondents’ Memoranda and Articles of Association and the respective constitutions. The litigation resulting in this appeal was precipitated by a letter the appellant wrote to the 1^st and 2^nd respondents opposing an application for the intended membership of Fabian Philippart, which was viewed as a misconduct on the part of the appellant and reported to the 4^th respondent for action.</p><p class="ql-align-justify">On the 31^st October, 2012, the management committee of the 1^st and 2^nd respondents met without the participation of th…</p>