JUDGMENT
MENSAH-DATSA, J.
The plaintiff claims against the defendant the following reliefs:
a. An order reversing and setting aside the decision of the defendant dated 3rd August, 2009 dismissing the plaintiff’s petition against the VAT Service.
b. An order granting to the plaintiff the reliefs he sought in his petition to the defendant dated 20th June 2005, i.e.
i. restoration of the plaintiff to the level of his contemporaries in the VAT Service, ii. Payment of all benefits due him,
iii. An order restraining the management of the VAT Service from victimizing him.
c. General damages.
d. Costs of litigation including solicitor’s fees.
The defendant counterclaimed against the plaintiff as follows:
1. The plaintiff is not entitled to any of his reliefs.
2. Punitive cost.
The plaintiff was until 16th September, 2002, a Senior Revenue Officer of the Value Added Tax (VAT) Service but was a Revenue Officer as at the time of instituting this action. The defendant, Comm…